Везде
U.S.’ South China Sea policy: The first steps under presidency of Joe Biden
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
U.S.’ South China Sea policy: The first steps under presidency of Joe Biden
Annotation
PII
S032150750017800-2-1
DOI
10.31857/S032150750017800-2
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Igor O. Mishin 
ORCID: 0000-0002-6547-1319
Occupation: Junior research fellow
Affiliation: Institute of World Economy and International Relations Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Issue 12
Pages
12-19
Abstract

The South China Sea conflict is still the «hot - spot» of the Asia-Pacific. In this article special attention is paid to the position of the United States in the South China Sea conflict under the presidency of Joe Biden.

US national interests in the South China Sea are shaped by the American desire to maintain its geopolitical dominance in the Asia-Pacific region and prevent the growth of any hostile power. Today, the South China Sea is the world's most important water area, control over which gives an economic and military advantage. In 2020 the United States officially declared the PRC a "country whose actions are aimed at revising the international order" and a "strategic rival". The United States believes that Beijing's policy of creating and militarizing outposts in the SCS allegedly jeopardizes free trade, threatens the sovereignty of other countries, and undermines regional stability. Moreover, the United States blames China for trying to use the pandemic as a way to achieve its goals in the South China Sea.

The first steps taken by Joe Biden administration clearly indicate Washington’s continuation of previous American hard line in South China Sea. Despite the change in presidential administrations, the United States continues to actively engage US Navy warships as part of operations to protect freedom of navigation, using them as a tool to contain China. In addition, the new administration is actively building an informal anti-Chinese coalition in the region, using both bilateral ties with allies and multilateral platforms, primarily NATO, Quad and AUKUS.

Keywords
Asia-Pacific, South China Sea, territorial dispute, US Foreign Policy, Freedom of Navigation, Law of the Sea
Acknowledgment
The article was prepared within the project “Post-crisis World Order: Challenges and Technologies, Competition and Cooperation" supported by the grant from Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation Program for Research Projects in Priority Areas of Scientific and Technological Development (Agreement № 075-15-2020-783).
Received
14.08.2021
Date of publication
08.12.2021
Number of purchasers
15
Views
3410
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
Additional services access
Additional services for the article
Services benefits
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Additional services for the issue
Services benefits
920 RUB / 16.0 SU
Additional services for all issues for 2021
Services benefits
8448 RUB / 169.0 SU

References

1. Bratersky M.V., Suslov D.V. 2014. US return to the Asia-Pacific. US Policy in the Asia-Pacific. Moscow. (In Russ.)

2. Mosyakov D.V. 2017. The new quality of the conflict in the South China Sea. The Southeast Asia: The actual problems of development. Issue XXX, № 36 (In Russ.)

3. Ott M. The South China Sea in Strategic Terms. Wilson Center. 14.05.2019. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/the-south-china-sea-strategic-terms (accessed 20.06.2021)

4. South China Sea: Beijing has a major natural advantage in the geopolitical power game. The Economic Times. 17.06.2020. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/south-china-sea-beijing-has-a-major-natural-advantage-in-the-geopolitical-power-game/articleshow/76423659.cms?from=mdr (accessed 20.06.2021)

5. Lokshin G.M. 2015. South-China Sea: Islands of discord. Aziya i Afrika segodnya. № 9 (In Russ.)

6. Indo-Pacific Strategy Report: Preparedness, and Promoting a Networked Region. The Department of Defense. 01.06.2019. P. 8.

7. U.S. Position on Maritime Claims in the South China Sea. Press Statement. U.S. Department of State. 13.07.2020. https://state.gov/u-s-position-on-maritime-claims-in-the-south-china-sea/ (accessed 14.06.2021)

8. Smith J. Biden Must Keep Challenging China on Freedom of Navigation. Foreign Policy. 16.02.2021. https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/02/16/biden-south-china-sea-spratlys/ (accessed 22.06.2021)

9. Weibao H. Invariance and change in the Biden administration’s South China Sea policy. ChinaDaily. 18.03.2021. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202103/18/WS6052a41aa31024ad0baafdd5.html (accessed 28.06.2021)

10. Gudev P.A. 2019. Political and legal aspects of US’ maritime policy in Asia-Pacific. Southeast Asia: actual problems of development. № 1(42) (In Russ.)

11. Panda A. US Navy Conducts First Post-Cold War FONOP in Peter the Great Bay, Off Russian Cost. The Diplomat. 06.12.2018. https://thediplomat.com/2018/12/us-navy-conducts-first-post-cold-war-fonop-in-peter-the-great-bay-off-russian-coast/ (accessed 28.06.2021)

12. 2020. National and International Strategies in Indo-Pacific. Analysis and Forecast / Eds. Mikheev V., Shvydko V. Moscow. P. 110 (In Russ.)

13. Tsvetov P.Yu. 2021. NATO rushes to the South China Sea. Aziya i Afrika segodnya, № 6 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/ S032150750015260-8

14. Valencia M. Biden should quickly address East, South China Sea issues. Asia Times. 08.03.2021. https://asiatimes.com/2021/03/biden-should-quickly-address-east-south-china-sea-issues/ (accessed 25.06.2021)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate