The Non-Ergodicity of the Social World: a Modern Doctrine
Table of contents
Share
Metrics
The Non-Ergodicity of the Social World: a Modern Doctrine
Annotation
PII
S0321-50750000617-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Abstract
In 2018, the most recent book by Nassim Taleb “Skin in the Game: Hidden Asymmetries in Daily Life” was finally made available to Russian readers. In it, just like in his previous bestsellers, the author raises several topical questions and offers his vision of their solutions. Taleb’s books are full of interesting and important claims, however, much more remains unsaid. The last book is no exception, and therefore I reflect on its contents, provide my comments on it, supplement the fundamental ideas of Taleb, and “embed” the key theses of the book in the context of modern social sciences. To do this, I propose a geometric model of the skin-in-the-game principle, which superimposes two population distribution functions – that of income and that of risk. I show that the extent of the divergence in the forms of the two curves acts as an imperfection of society and illustrates the degree of implementation of this principle. I further argue that this corresponds to the global civilizational trend, according to which the risks shift from the physical world into the social. The article demonstrates that the skin-in-the-game principle was widely used in the Soviet Union during Stalin’s era, and for many years has been promoted in the modern political discourse in Russia by opposition parties and leaders. In modern international politics, this principle is fully consistent with the act of recognizing the Golan heights by the USA as legitimate Israeli territory. To illustrate how non-ergodicity emerges as a feature of a social system,I offer some simple formulas for quantifying the effectiveness of the system that take into account the emergence factor stemming from the interaction between the system’s elements. I also show the substantive equivalence of the doctrines of non-ergodicity and unpredictability offered by Taleb, Douglass North and George Soros. I argue that Taleb’s concept of local ethics is closely related to Fukuyama’s concept of the radius of trust. In conclusion, I consider an expanded model of personal success, which rests on five factors: natural talent, the ability to work, the factor of fortune, inheritance, and the effect of shifting risk to third parties.
Keywords
risk, institutions, information, success, ergodicity, non-ergodicity, consistency
Date of publication
01.01.2020
Number of purchasers
12
Views
445
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for
1

References



Additional sources and materials

Adzhemoglu D., Robinson Dzh. (2015) Pochemu odni strany bogatye, a drugie bednye. Pro­iskhozhdenie vlasti, protsvetaniya i nischety. M.: AST.
Balatskij E.V. (2011) Kognitivno-institutsional'nyj sintez D. Norta // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. № 5. S. 154–166.
Balatskij E.V. (2018) Kontseptsiya uskorennogo nakopleniya kapitala i ee razvitie T. Piket­ti // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. № 1. S. 119–132.
Gossekretar' SShA prizval ne sravnivat' situatsiyu s Golanami i Krymom (2019) // News.mail.ru. 10 aprelya 2019 // https://news.mail.ru/politics/36917725/?frommail=1
Kovaleva K. (2018) «Riskuya sobstvennoj shkuroj» // Livejournal.com. 9 sentyabrya 2018 // https://kovaleva.livejournal.com/409564.html
Kolesnikov A. (2018) «Riskuya sobstvennoj shkuroj». Okonchanie. Nassim Taleb. Klyuchevye idei iz knigi // Smart-lab.ru. 5 sentyabrya 2018 // https://smart-lab.ru/blog/492397.php
Mukhin Yu. (2011) Tiraniya gluposti. SPb: Piter.
Nassim Nikolas Taleb. «Riskuya sobstvennoj shkuroj. Skrytaya asimmetriya po­vsednevnoj zhizni» – retsenziya megadobro (2018) // Livelib.ru. 1 oktyabrya 2018 // https://www.livelib.ru/review/1018333-riskuya-sobstvennoj-shkuroj-skrytaya-asimmetriya-povsednevnoj-zhizni-nassim-nikolas-taleb
Nort D. (2010) Ponimanie protsessa ehkonomicheskikh izmenenij. M.: VShEh.
Rybakov E. (2018) Retsenziya na knigu «Riskuya sobstvennoj shkuroj. Skry­taya asimmetriya povsednevnoj zhizni» // Ozon.ru. 19 noyabrya 2018 // https://www.ozon.ru/context/detail/id/146842421/
Soros Dzh. (1996) Alkhimiya finansov. M.: Infra-M.
Taleb N.N. (2009) Chernyj lebed'. Pod znakom nepredskazuemosti. M.: KoLibri.
Taleb N.N. (2018) Riskuya sobstvennoj shkuroj: Skrytaya asimmetriya povsednevnoj zhizni. M.: KoLibri, Azbuka-Attikus.
Faizova L. (2018) Avtor «Chernogo lebedya» rasskazal, kak Putin, Tramp i Baf­fet «riskuyut svoej shkuroj» // Livejournal.com. 17 avgusta 2018 // https://storm100.livejournal.com/5371596.html
Fukuyama F. (2006) Doverie. M.: AST.
Shegaj V. (2018) Istinnyj intellekt ne kazhetsya intellektual'nym // Vc.ru. 22 avgu­sta 2018 // https://vc.ru/flood/44198-istinnyy-intellekt-ne-kazhetsya-intellektualnym
Leith W. (2018) Skin in the Game by Nassim Nicholas Taleb – Review: Why We Should Put Our Faith in People Who Have Something to Lose // Evening Standard, March 1, 2018 //
https://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/books/skin-in-the-game-by-by-nassim-nicholas-taleb-review-a3779451.html
Nassim Taleb Explains the Power of “Skin in the Game” (2018) // The Economist, February 22, 2018 // https://www.economist.com/books-and-arts/2018/02/22/ nassim-taleb-explains-the-power-of-skin-in-the-game
Sabharwal A. (2018) A Review of Skin in the Game by Nassim Nicholas Taleb // Medium, April 1, 2018 // https://medium.com/the-agenda-iyea/a-review-of-skin-in-the-game-by-nassim-nicholas-taleb-ec6efcec167a
Williams Z. (2018) Skin in the Game by Nassim Nicholas Taleb Review – How Risk Should Be Shared // The Guardian, February 22, 2018 // https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/ feb/22/skin-in-the-game-nassim-nicholas-taleb-review

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate